Subjects

Subjects

More

Why Russia Left WW1 and What Happened in the Russian Revolution of 1917

View

Why Russia Left WW1 and What Happened in the Russian Revolution of 1917
user profile picture

Erin Oneill

@erinoneill_nwll

·

36 Followers

Follow

The economic impact of World War I on Russia 1917 was severe, leading to financial crisis, inflation, and widespread shortages. Social upheaval during Russian February Revolution was fueled by war-weariness, food scarcity, and mass mobilization. Political consequences of Tsar Nicholas II decisions included loss of public confidence, isolation from government affairs, and ultimately, his abdication.

  • World War I severely strained Russia's economy, society, and political system
  • Economic crisis led to inflation, food shortages, and strikes
  • Social upheaval resulted from mass mobilization and war casualties
  • Tsar Nicholas II's decisions eroded public support and political stability
  • These factors culminated in the February Revolution of 1917

06/05/2023

124

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

View

Political Impact of World War I on Russia

The war's political impact was equally significant, contributing to the erosion of support for Tsar Nicholas II and his regime. In August 1915, over half of the Duma deputies organized themselves into a "Progressive Bloc," demanding constitutional reforms and a more representative government.

Quote: When asked about the loss of confidence, Tsar Nicholas II replied, "Do you mean that I am to regain the confidence of my people, or they are to regain mine?"

The Tsar's refusal to accommodate these demands further isolated him politically. Non-governmental organizations like the Union of Towns and Union of Zemstvos joined to form Zemgor, highlighting the government's failures and proving that alternatives to Tsarism could work effectively.

Definition: Zemgor - A coalition of local self-government bodies formed to assist in the war effort.

The war revealed the anachronistic nature of the Tsarist regime, with growing literacy rates helping to erode the myth of Tsarist autocracy. This political instability set the stage for the Russian Revolution and the eventual overthrow of the monarchy.

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

View

Economic Impact of World War I on Russia

The economic impact of World War I on Russia was severe and far-reaching. Government spending skyrocketed from 4 million to 30 million roubles between 1914-1917, with the war costing 13.6 billion roubles by 1917. To meet these demands, the government resorted to printing more money, leading to significant inflation.

Highlight: The cost of living increased by 300%, rendering the rouble nearly worthless.

While wages doubled between 1914-1916, the prices of food and fuel quadrupled, causing widespread economic hardship. The railway system collapsed, with 575 stations unable to handle freight by 1916. This economic strain led to labor unrest, with 30,000 workers striking in Moscow and 145,000 in Petrograd by January 1917.

Example: By 1916, Moscow and Petrograd received only 1/4 to 1/5 of their required food supplies, as peasants began hoarding grain.

The social upheaval during the Russian February Revolution was exacerbated by these economic conditions. Mass mobilization for the war effort disrupted society, with 14 million people conscripted, primarily from the peasantry and working classes. This led to labor shortages and further economic strain.

Vocabulary: Conscription - The compulsory enlistment of people for military service.

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

View

Alexandra and Rasputin's Role in the February Revolution

The influence of Tsarina Alexandra and Grigori Rasputin on the government during Tsar Nicholas II's absence at military headquarters significantly contributed to the Russian Revolution. Their de facto control of the government from 1915 onwards led to political instability and widespread discontent.

Vocabulary: De facto - In reality or in effect, although not formally acknowledged.

Rumors of an affair between Rasputin and Alexandra, coupled with Alexandra's German heritage, fueled negative propaganda against the royal family. The Tsarina was accused of sabotaging the Russian war effort due to her German background.

Highlight: Between 1915-1916, there were frequent changes in government positions, including 4 prime ministers, 3 foreign secretaries, 3 ministers of defense, and 6 interior ministers.

The influence of Alexandra and Rasputin led to the alienation of the aristocracy, one of the Tsar's key pillars of support. Prince Yusupov's murder of Rasputin in December 1916 was an attempt to save the monarchy's reputation, but it came too late.

Quote: By the beginning of 1917, few were prepared to defend Rasputin's game of "Ministerial leapfrog."

The mismanagement and perceived corruption associated with Alexandra and Rasputin's influence significantly contributed to the loss of support for the Tsarist regime, paving the way for the February Revolution of 1917 and the end of the Romanov dynasty.

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

View

Tsar Nicholas II's Mistakes and the February Revolution

Tsar Nicholas II's decision to become Commander-in-Chief in August 1915 proved to be a critical mistake. This move made him directly accountable for military failures and isolated him from political events in Petrograd.

Highlight: Nicholas II's absence from Petrograd left his wife Alexandra and Rasputin in control of the government, leading to widespread discontent.

The Tsar's military appointments were often based on social standing rather than military skill, contributing to Russia's poor performance in the war. His decision to enter World War I despite Russia's lack of stability and reliance on France for economic support further weakened the country.

Example: Desertion rates increased to 6,000 per month by February 1916, with some soldiers sent to fight without proper training or equipment.

The Tsar's failure to reform and listen to political advice, particularly from the Duma, led to his increasing isolation. The formation of the Progressive Bloc in the Duma and Nicholas's dismissal of their support further eroded his political base.

Quote: "Few people wished to support the weak, arrogant Tsar and the outdated regime which he stood for, thus contributing to the Revolution."

These factors culminated in the February Revolution of 1917, leading to Tsar Nicholas II's abdication on March 3rd.

Can't find what you're looking for? Explore other subjects.

Knowunity is the #1 education app in five European countries

Knowunity has been named a featured story on Apple and has regularly topped the app store charts in the education category in Germany, Italy, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Join Knowunity today and help millions of students around the world.

Ranked #1 Education App

Download in

Google Play

Download in

App Store

Knowunity is the #1 education app in five European countries

4.9+

Average app rating

13 M

Pupils love Knowunity

#1

In education app charts in 12 countries

950 K+

Students have uploaded notes

Still not convinced? See what other students are saying...

iOS User

I love this app so much, I also use it daily. I recommend Knowunity to everyone!!! I went from a D to an A with it :D

Philip, iOS User

The app is very simple and well designed. So far I have always found everything I was looking for :D

Lena, iOS user

I love this app ❤️ I actually use it every time I study.

Why Russia Left WW1 and What Happened in the Russian Revolution of 1917

user profile picture

Erin Oneill

@erinoneill_nwll

·

36 Followers

Follow

The economic impact of World War I on Russia 1917 was severe, leading to financial crisis, inflation, and widespread shortages. Social upheaval during Russian February Revolution was fueled by war-weariness, food scarcity, and mass mobilization. Political consequences of Tsar Nicholas II decisions included loss of public confidence, isolation from government affairs, and ultimately, his abdication.

  • World War I severely strained Russia's economy, society, and political system
  • Economic crisis led to inflation, food shortages, and strikes
  • Social upheaval resulted from mass mobilization and war casualties
  • Tsar Nicholas II's decisions eroded public support and political stability
  • These factors culminated in the February Revolution of 1917

06/05/2023

124

 

13

 

History

5

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

Sign up to see the content. It's free!

Access to all documents

Improve your grades

Join milions of students

By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Political Impact of World War I on Russia

The war's political impact was equally significant, contributing to the erosion of support for Tsar Nicholas II and his regime. In August 1915, over half of the Duma deputies organized themselves into a "Progressive Bloc," demanding constitutional reforms and a more representative government.

Quote: When asked about the loss of confidence, Tsar Nicholas II replied, "Do you mean that I am to regain the confidence of my people, or they are to regain mine?"

The Tsar's refusal to accommodate these demands further isolated him politically. Non-governmental organizations like the Union of Towns and Union of Zemstvos joined to form Zemgor, highlighting the government's failures and proving that alternatives to Tsarism could work effectively.

Definition: Zemgor - A coalition of local self-government bodies formed to assist in the war effort.

The war revealed the anachronistic nature of the Tsarist regime, with growing literacy rates helping to erode the myth of Tsarist autocracy. This political instability set the stage for the Russian Revolution and the eventual overthrow of the monarchy.

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

Sign up to see the content. It's free!

Access to all documents

Improve your grades

Join milions of students

By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Economic Impact of World War I on Russia

The economic impact of World War I on Russia was severe and far-reaching. Government spending skyrocketed from 4 million to 30 million roubles between 1914-1917, with the war costing 13.6 billion roubles by 1917. To meet these demands, the government resorted to printing more money, leading to significant inflation.

Highlight: The cost of living increased by 300%, rendering the rouble nearly worthless.

While wages doubled between 1914-1916, the prices of food and fuel quadrupled, causing widespread economic hardship. The railway system collapsed, with 575 stations unable to handle freight by 1916. This economic strain led to labor unrest, with 30,000 workers striking in Moscow and 145,000 in Petrograd by January 1917.

Example: By 1916, Moscow and Petrograd received only 1/4 to 1/5 of their required food supplies, as peasants began hoarding grain.

The social upheaval during the Russian February Revolution was exacerbated by these economic conditions. Mass mobilization for the war effort disrupted society, with 14 million people conscripted, primarily from the peasantry and working classes. This led to labor shortages and further economic strain.

Vocabulary: Conscription - The compulsory enlistment of people for military service.

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

Sign up to see the content. It's free!

Access to all documents

Improve your grades

Join milions of students

By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Alexandra and Rasputin's Role in the February Revolution

The influence of Tsarina Alexandra and Grigori Rasputin on the government during Tsar Nicholas II's absence at military headquarters significantly contributed to the Russian Revolution. Their de facto control of the government from 1915 onwards led to political instability and widespread discontent.

Vocabulary: De facto - In reality or in effect, although not formally acknowledged.

Rumors of an affair between Rasputin and Alexandra, coupled with Alexandra's German heritage, fueled negative propaganda against the royal family. The Tsarina was accused of sabotaging the Russian war effort due to her German background.

Highlight: Between 1915-1916, there were frequent changes in government positions, including 4 prime ministers, 3 foreign secretaries, 3 ministers of defense, and 6 interior ministers.

The influence of Alexandra and Rasputin led to the alienation of the aristocracy, one of the Tsar's key pillars of support. Prince Yusupov's murder of Rasputin in December 1916 was an attempt to save the monarchy's reputation, but it came too late.

Quote: By the beginning of 1917, few were prepared to defend Rasputin's game of "Ministerial leapfrog."

The mismanagement and perceived corruption associated with Alexandra and Rasputin's influence significantly contributed to the loss of support for the Tsarist regime, paving the way for the February Revolution of 1917 and the end of the Romanov dynasty.

ECONOMIC
Between 1917-1914 Government
Spending rose from 4-30 million roubles.
By 1917 the war cost 13.6 billion.
The Government there fore

Sign up to see the content. It's free!

Access to all documents

Improve your grades

Join milions of students

By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Tsar Nicholas II's Mistakes and the February Revolution

Tsar Nicholas II's decision to become Commander-in-Chief in August 1915 proved to be a critical mistake. This move made him directly accountable for military failures and isolated him from political events in Petrograd.

Highlight: Nicholas II's absence from Petrograd left his wife Alexandra and Rasputin in control of the government, leading to widespread discontent.

The Tsar's military appointments were often based on social standing rather than military skill, contributing to Russia's poor performance in the war. His decision to enter World War I despite Russia's lack of stability and reliance on France for economic support further weakened the country.

Example: Desertion rates increased to 6,000 per month by February 1916, with some soldiers sent to fight without proper training or equipment.

The Tsar's failure to reform and listen to political advice, particularly from the Duma, led to his increasing isolation. The formation of the Progressive Bloc in the Duma and Nicholas's dismissal of their support further eroded his political base.

Quote: "Few people wished to support the weak, arrogant Tsar and the outdated regime which he stood for, thus contributing to the Revolution."

These factors culminated in the February Revolution of 1917, leading to Tsar Nicholas II's abdication on March 3rd.

Can't find what you're looking for? Explore other subjects.

Knowunity is the #1 education app in five European countries

Knowunity has been named a featured story on Apple and has regularly topped the app store charts in the education category in Germany, Italy, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Join Knowunity today and help millions of students around the world.

Ranked #1 Education App

Download in

Google Play

Download in

App Store

Knowunity is the #1 education app in five European countries

4.9+

Average app rating

13 M

Pupils love Knowunity

#1

In education app charts in 12 countries

950 K+

Students have uploaded notes

Still not convinced? See what other students are saying...

iOS User

I love this app so much, I also use it daily. I recommend Knowunity to everyone!!! I went from a D to an A with it :D

Philip, iOS User

The app is very simple and well designed. So far I have always found everything I was looking for :D

Lena, iOS user

I love this app ❤️ I actually use it every time I study.