Section A: Reading Skills (Questions 2-4)

Question 2 is your quickest win at 8 marks in just 10 minutes. You're looking for differences between two sources, not similarities. Find contrasting points, grab relevant quotes, but don't analyse them - just show the difference clearly without paraphrasing.

Question 3 focuses on language analysis for 12 marks in 15 minutes. You're hunting for specific techniques like emotive language, repetition, rhetorical questions, and hyperbole. Don't just spot them - explain their effect on the reader in detail.

Question 4 is the big one: 16 marks comparing writers' perspectives and methods. You need to identify different attitudes in both texts, then compare how writers use facts, opinions, statistics, and tone to convey these views.

Top tip: Always link methods to their purpose - why did the writer choose this technique for this particular audience?

Section B: Your Own Writing (Question 5)

This 40-mark question is worth the most, so nail your timing: 5 minutes planning, 35 minutes writing, 5 minutes proofreading. You'll write in response to a theme from Section A, usually as an article, speech, or letter.

Pick a clear character perspective - maybe an angry parent, experienced teacher, or concerned teenager. This helps you maintain consistent tone and makes your writing more engaging. Stick to arguing one side strongly rather than sitting on the fence.

Your persuasive techniques toolkit includes facts, statistics, direct address, rhetorical questions, and emotive language. Use sentence variety for impact - sometimes a single-line paragraph hits harder than a long explanation.

Remember the technical details: correct letter formats, catchy article headlines with alliteration, and matching your formality to your audience. The examiners want to see you can argue, persuade, or advise convincingly.

Remember: 24 marks go to your ideas and style, 16 marks to spelling, punctuation, and grammar - both matter!