The financial struggles of the English monarchy in the early 1600s were a major source of conflict with Parliament. Several factors contributed to the Crown's financial difficulties:

• A century of inflation had eroded the value of traditional royal income sources
• The Crown had sold off or leased much of its land, reducing rental income
• Customs duties and feudal rights provided inconsistent revenue

As a result, monarchs increasingly relied on parliamentary subsidies to fund expenses, especially for foreign policy initiatives like warfare. This dependence on Parliament for money created leverage for MPs to challenge royal authority.

James I attempted to address the financial issues through the Great Contract of 1610, negotiated by Robert Cecil. This proposed major reforms to Crown finances in exchange for parliamentary subsidies. However, the negotiations ultimately collapsed due to mutual distrust and disagreements over royal impositions.

Example: The Great Contract proposed trading traditional feudal dues for a fixed annual parliamentary grant of £200,000.

Charles I's financial desperation led him to impose the controversial Forced Loan of 1626 without parliamentary approval. This arbitrary taxation further damaged relations with Parliament and the public.

Definition: A Forced Loan was a form of prerogative taxation imposed by the monarch, typically on wealthy subjects.

The Crown's ongoing financial weakness undermined its independence and authority, contributing significantly to the breakdown in relations with Parliament by 1629.

Religious divisions played a crucial role in the deteriorating relationship between Crown and Parliament from 1603-1629. While James I generally maintained a balanced approach to religious policy, tensions escalated dramatically under Charles I.

Key developments under James I included:

• The Hampton Court Conference of 1604, addressing Puritan grievances
• Publication of the King James Bible in 1611
• James' "no bishop, no king" stance supporting episcopal church governance

However, religious conflicts intensified under Charles I:

• The rise of Arminianism, a theological movement emphasizing free will
• Appointment of William Laud as Bishop of London in 1628, despite his controversial views
• Growing fears among Puritan-leaning MPs about a shift away from Calvinism

Vocabulary: Arminianism was a theological doctrine that rejected Calvinist predestination and emphasized human free will in salvation.

Highlight: The appointment of Richard Montagu as Royal Chaplain in 1625 despite his anti-Calvinist views alarmed many MPs.

Religious policy became increasingly divisive, with Parliament viewing Charles I's actions as potentially pro-Catholic. This religious tension contributed significantly to the overall breakdown in Crown-Parliament relations by 1629.

The reliance of James I and Charles I on powerful royal favorites, particularly George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, was a major source of conflict with Parliament from 1603-1629. Buckingham's rise to prominence and influence over both monarchs angered many MPs.

Key issues surrounding royal favorites included:

• Accusations of corruption and abuse of power
• Resentment over their influence on royal policy
• Concerns about their competence, especially in military matters

Parliament's frustration with Buckingham culminated in his impeachment in 1626, which Charles I prevented by dissolving Parliament. This action further damaged relations between Crown and Parliament.

Quote: "The Duke of Buckingham is the cause of all our miseries." - Sir John Eliot, during Buckingham's impeachment proceedings

The controversy surrounding royal favorites like Buckingham contributed to a growing sense of distrust between the monarch and Parliament, exacerbating other areas of conflict and ultimately leading to the breakdown of relations by 1629.

Disagreements over foreign policy, particularly regarding war and its funding, were a significant factor in the deterioration of Crown-Parliament relations from 1603-1629. Both James I and Charles I faced challenges in securing parliamentary support for their international initiatives.

Key foreign policy disputes included:

• James I's pursuit of a Spanish marriage alliance for his son, opposed by many MPs
• Debates over England's involvement in the Thirty Years' War
• Charles I's wars with Spain and France, which strained royal finances

These foreign policy conflicts intersected with other areas of tension:

• Constitutional disputes over the royal prerogative in matters of war and peace
• Financial struggles, as wars required parliamentary subsidies
• Religious concerns, particularly regarding alliances with Catholic powers

Example: The 1621 Commons Protestation, which asserted Parliament's right to debate foreign policy, led James I to dissolve Parliament and tear up the document.

Charles I's need for war funding led to controversial measures like the Forced Loan of 1626, further damaging relations with Parliament. The failure of military expeditions, such as the disastrous attack on Cádiz in 1625, also undermined parliamentary support for royal foreign policy.

These ongoing disputes over foreign affairs contributed significantly to the overall breakdown in Crown-Parliament relations by 1629.

The Petition of Right of 1628 was a crucial moment in the deteriorating relationship between Charles I and Parliament. This document, drafted by Parliament, sought to address key grievances against the king's actions:

1. Forced loans and arbitrary taxation without parliamentary consent
2. Imprisonment without due process
3. Billeting of soldiers in private homes
4. Use of martial law in peacetime

Charles I initially attempted to avoid accepting the Petition but ultimately agreed under financial pressure. However, his subsequent actions demonstrated a lack of commitment to its principles:

• Continued collection of customs duties without parliamentary approval
• Promotion of Arminian clergy, against parliamentary wishes
• Refusal to punish those who had enforced martial law

Highlight: The Petition of Right became a foundational document in English constitutional history, asserting parliamentary rights against royal prerogative.

The king's failure to honor the spirit of the Petition further eroded trust between Crown and Parliament, contributing to the final breakdown of relations in 1629.

The breakdown of Crown-Parliament relations reached its climax in 1629 with the dramatic events surrounding the Three Resolutions. This incident marked the final collapse of cooperation between Charles I and Parliament until 1640.

Key events of the 1629 crisis:

1. Charles attempted to adjourn Parliament before it could pass resolutions critical of his policies
2. MPs physically held the Speaker in his chair to prevent adjournment
3. The Commons passed three resolutions declaring: Anyone seeking to extend or introduce "popery or Arminianism" was an enemy of the kingdom Anyone advising the collection of tonnage and poundage without parliamentary consent was an enemy of the kingdom Merchants paying these duties were "betrayers of the liberties of England"

Quote: "You shall sit till we please to rise." - Denzil Holles to the Speaker during the Three Resolutions incident

Charles I responded by dissolving Parliament and arresting the leaders of the protest. This marked the beginning of his Personal Rule, governing without Parliament for 11 years.

The Three Resolutions incident epitomized the complete breakdown of trust and cooperation between Crown and Parliament, culminating the tensions that had been building since 1603.

The deterioration of relations between the Crown and Parliament from 1603 to 1629 was the result of a complex interplay of factors:

1. Constitutional disputes over the extent of royal prerogative powers
2. Financial struggles of the monarchy and conflicts over taxation
3. Religious tensions, particularly the rise of Arminianism under Charles I
4. Controversies surrounding royal favorites, especially the Duke of Buckingham
5. Disagreements over foreign policy and war funding

These issues were interconnected and mutually reinforcing, creating a cycle of distrust and conflict that ultimately led to the breakdown of cooperation between monarch and Parliament.

Highlight: While both James I and Charles I contributed to the deterioration, Charles I's more confrontational approach and failure to compromise accelerated the crisis.

The events of 1629, particularly the Three Resolutions incident, marked the culmination of these long-standing tensions. The subsequent period of Personal Rule set the stage for the even more severe conflicts that would emerge in the 1640s, ultimately leading to the English Civil War.

Understanding this breakdown is crucial for comprehending the long-term development of English constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy.

This period saw a progressive deterioration in relations through various political and economic developments, from James I's accession to the throne through multiple parliamentary conflicts.

Highlight: Key events included the peace with Spain $1604$, the Bates Case $1608$, and the failure of the Great Contract $1610$.

The relationship between the Crown and Parliament deteriorated significantly from 1603-1629 due to constitutional power struggles. Both James I and Charles I had major disputes with Parliament over the extent of royal prerogative powers.

Under James I, key conflicts included:

• The 1604 Buckinghamshire Election Case, challenging the king's authority over elections
• James dissolving Parliament in 1621 after disputes over war policy and tearing up the Commons Protestation

Charles I escalated tensions through actions like:

• Impeaching the Duke of Buckingham in 1626
• Rejecting the Petition of Right in 1628
• Forcibly preventing Parliament from adjourning in the 1629 Three Resolutions incident

Highlight: The constitutional clashes centered on disagreements over the balance of power between monarch and Parliament, especially regarding the royal prerogative.

Definition: Royal prerogative refers to the monarch's right to take certain actions without parliamentary approval, such as declaring war.

These constitutional disputes laid the groundwork for the eventual breakdown in Crown-Parliament relations by 1629.