The Bloody Code and Its Impact

The Bloody Code was a harsh system of punishment introduced in 1688 that prescribed public execution for many crimes. This system was a response to several societal factors:

Highlight: The Bloody Code was implemented as a deterrent to combat rising crime rates in an increasingly urbanized society.

Factors contributing to the introduction of the Bloody Code:

1. Urbanization and population growth
2. Increased poverty due to enclosure and changes in the countryside
3. Improved transportation leading to more targets for crime
4. Spread of news through printing presses, causing public fear and worry

Vocabulary: Vagabonds - people without a settled home or regular work, often viewed as potential criminals in this era.

The Bloody Code expanded over time:

• 1688: 50 crimes punishable by death
• 1765: 160 crimes
• 1810: 222 crimes

However, the Bloody Code eventually ended due to changing attitudes:

1. Rehabilitation became more popular
2. Humanitarianism grew, making the death penalty seem inhumane
3. Prisons were seen as more humane and effective alternatives
4. Juries became reluctant to convict due to harsh punishments
5. Public executions were seen as entertainment rather than deterrents

Example: The Punishment of Death Act 1832 reduced the number of capital crimes from 200 to 60, signaling the beginning of the end for the Bloody Code.

The 19th century saw significant changes in law enforcement, including the introduction of a police force, which served as a deterrent by increasing the likelihood of getting caught.

Prison Reforms and Government Acts in the 19th Century

The 19th century saw significant reforms in the prison system, influenced by reformers and changing societal attitudes.

Key government acts and their impacts:

1. 1823 Gaols Act:

   • Influenced by John Howard, Elizabeth Fry, and Robert Peel
   • Improved prison conditions
   • Introduced government-appointed inspectors (from 1835)

2. 1839 Prisons Act:

   • Advocated for the separate system
   • Emphasized rehabilitation through self-reflection

3. 1865 Prisons Act:

   • Shifted focus from rehabilitation to deterrence and retribution
   • Introduced the "Hard labour, hard fare, hard board" principle
   • Enforced a strict, uniform regime of punishment in every prison

Quote: "Hard labour, hard fare, hard board" - The principle guiding prison management under the 1865 Prisons Act.

4. 1877 Act:

   • Brought all prisons under government control
   • Ensured standardization across prisons

5. 1898 Prisons Act:

   • Re-emphasized rehabilitation and reform of prisoners

Changes to prisons in the 18th and 19th centuries:

• Introduction of the separate system
• Improved facilities and cleanliness
• Religious education for prisoners
• Emphasis on both deterrence and rehabilitation

Example: Pentonville Prison, opened in 1842, featured a radial building design for separation and security, along with good facilities and cleanliness.

The Rise of Modern Prisons: Pentonville and the Separate System

Pentonville Prison, opened in 1842, became a model for British prisons and introduced the 'separate system' of incarceration.

Key features of Pentonville Prison:

1. Designed to hold 520 prisoners
2. Central hall with four cell blocks and a chapel
3. Influenced by English prison reformer John Howard
4. Based on the 'separate system' originated in the US in the 1820s

Definition: The separate system was a method of prison management where inmates were kept in individual cells to reflect on their behavior and receive Christian teachings.

The separate system at Pentonville included:

• Private cells for inmates
• Limited time outside cells for exercise and church attendance
• Chaplains as the primary human contact
• Masks worn in the yard to prevent communication

Highlight: Between 1842 and 1848, 54 other prisons were built based on the Pentonville model.

Reasons for the shift to prisons:

1. Rising crime rates (5,000 to 20,000 crimes per year from 1800-1840)
2. End of transportation to Australia (officially ended in 1868)
3. Decline of the Bloody Code
4. Belief in rehabilitation and reform

The 1865 Prisons Act, introduced by Sir Edmund Ducane, emphasized "Hard labour, hard fare, hard board" as a way for criminals to pay back society.

While initially deemed a success, Pentonville faced challenges:

• Three inmates committed suicide
• Some prisoners developed severe mental illnesses
• The separate system was gradually modified and ended by the 1900s