Talcott Parsons' "The Social Structure of the Family" $1959$ outlined distinct roles for husbands and wives in nuclear families:

• Husbands have an instrumental role - focused on work outside the home to financially support the family as breadwinners
• Wives have an expressive role - providing primary socialization for children and meeting the family's emotional needs as homemakers

Parsons argued these roles were based on biological differences between men and women. He claimed this division benefited men, women, children, and wider society by creating stability.

Definition: The instrumental function in sociology refers to task-oriented roles focused on achieving practical goals, while expressive roles focus on maintaining relationships and emotional wellbeing.

Highlight: Parsons' functionalist theory assumes an unequal domestic division of labor is natural and beneficial, a view heavily critiqued by feminist sociologists.

Sociologists have examined how marital roles have changed over time:

Elizabeth Bott identified two types of conjugal roles:

1. Segregated - separate roles for husbands and wives $similar to Parsons' model$
2. Joint - shared tasks and leisure time

Young and Willmott took a "march of progress" view, arguing families were becoming more equal:

• 1950s study found very separate roles in working-class families
• By 1973, they claimed joint conjugal roles and "symmetrical families" were emerging

Example: In segregated roles, men might spend leisure time at the pub while women socialize with female relatives. Joint roles involve couples sharing housework and spending free time together.

Highlight: The concept of "symmetrical families" with more equal roles has been influential but also critiqued as overly optimistic.

Feminist critiques of housework equality argue that despite some changes, significant inequalities in domestic labor persist:

• Ann Oakley found Young and Willmott's claims of symmetrical families were exaggerated: Only 15% of husbands had high participation in housework Only 25% had high participation in childcare
• Boulton's research showed less than 20% of fathers had a major role in childcare Argued studies focus too much on specific tasks rather than overall responsibility
• Warde and Hetherington found men would only do "female" tasks when partners were absent However, noted changing attitudes in younger men

Quote: "There's no sign of a 'new man' who equals the share of housework" - Feminist perspective

Highlight: Feminist sociologists argue that women's entry into paid work has not led to an equal redistribution of domestic labor.

Research on how women's increased participation in paid work affects the domestic division of labor shows mixed results:

Arguments for increased equality:

• Gershuny: Women working full-time leads to more equal division at home
• Sullivan: Trend of women doing less housework and men doing more

Arguments against increased equality:

• Concept of the "dual burden" - women doing paid work and most unpaid domestic tasks
• Ferri and Smith: Less than 4% of fathers took primary responsibility for childcare
• Braun et al: Most fathers still had a "provider ideology"

Vocabulary: "Dual burden" refers to women's responsibility for both paid employment and unpaid domestic work.

Example: Hochschild's concept of "emotion work" highlights how women often manage family members' emotions in addition to practical tasks.

Highlight: The impact of women's paid work on household roles remains debated, with evidence of both change and continuity.

Crompton and Lyonette identify two main explanations for the persistent unequal division of domestic labor:

1. Cultural explanations: Patriarchal norms socialize women into domestic roles Gershuny: Parents' more equal relationships influence children's later division of labor Kan: Younger men do more housework
2. Material explanations: Women's lower pay used to justify doing more housework Kan: For every £10,000 more a woman earns, she does 2 hours less housework per week

Example: Dunne found lesbian couples often had more symmetrical relationships due to the absence of heterosexual "gender scripts."

Highlight: Both cultural norms and economic factors contribute to the persistent gender division of domestic labor.

While not directly addressed in the transcript, it's important to consider:

• Women's unpaid work statistics show they perform a disproportionate share of household and care work
• The value of women's unpaid work is substantial but often overlooked in economic measures
• Unpaid care and domestic work has significant impacts on women's labor force participation and earnings

Highlight: Recognizing and valuing unpaid domestic and care work is crucial for understanding gender inequality and economic contributions.

The domestic division of labor refers to how household tasks and childcare responsibilities are shared between partners. Talcott Parsons' family theory from 1959 proposed distinct roles for husbands and wives based on biological differences, but this view has been heavily critiqued by feminist sociologists.

Key points:

• Parsons argued husbands have an instrumental role as breadwinners while wives have an expressive role focused on emotional needs and childcare
• This traditional model assumes an unequal division of domestic labor
• More recent sociological research examines if family roles have become more equal over time
• Feminist critiques highlight persistent inequalities in housework and childcare responsibilities
• The impact of women's increased participation in paid work on domestic roles remains debated

Highlight: Understanding changing family roles and the division of household labor provides insight into gender inequality in society.