Getting Started with History Questions

History exams can feel overwhelming, but they're actually quite predictable once you know the patterns. Every question type has a specific structure that examiners expect to see.

The key is recognising which type of question you're facing and applying the right formula. Whether it's analysing sources, writing essays, or making comparisons, having a clear template means you'll never sit staring at a blank page again.

Top Tip: Always read the question twice and identify the command word (explain, describe, evaluate) before you start writing.

"How Fully Does the Source Explain" Questions

These questions test whether you can spot what's missing from a source, not just what's there. Start by acknowledging that the source explains the topic fairly well.

Use the formula: "The source states $quote$ which accurately explains $your interpretation$." Repeat this pattern for three different points from the source. This shows you understand what the source is telling you.

Then flip it around with "However, the source fails to mention $missing information$. This means $why this gap matters$." Do this three times to show your broader historical knowledge.

The examiner wants to see you can both extract information and identify limitations - it's like showing you know what's in the box and what's been left out.

"How Fully Does the Source Describe" Questions

This follows a nearly identical pattern to the "explain" question, but focuses on descriptive accuracy rather than explanation. Begin with "The source describes $topic$ fairly well."

Use "The source states $quote$ which is accurate as $your knowledge$" three times. You're essentially fact-checking the source against what you know about the historical period.

Follow up with "However, the source fails to mention $missing detail$" three times. Don't explain why these omissions matter - just identify what's absent.

Remember: Describe questions want facts and details, whilst explain questions want you to show understanding of cause and effect.

Standalone "Explain" Questions

Explain questions are all about showing cause and effect relationships. You need to demonstrate why things happened, not just what happened.

Structure each paragraph as "One reason $factor$. This means $consequence or impact$." The "this means" part is crucial - it's where you show your understanding rather than just listing facts.

Aim for five to six reasons, each followed by your explanation of its significance. Think of it like building a case - each reason is evidence, and each "this means" is your analysis of that evidence.

Keep your reasons focused and avoid telling the story chronologically. Instead, group related factors together and explain their individual impact on the situation.

Standalone "Describe" Questions

Describe questions are more straightforward - they want factual information without deep analysis. Think of yourself as a reporter covering the historical events.

Use simple paragraph starters: "One reason," "Another reason," "Another reason," "A final reason." Keep it factual and avoid explaining why things happened.

Focus on specific details, dates, names, and events. You're painting a picture of what the historical situation looked like, not analysing why it developed that way.

Quick Check: If you find yourself writing "because" or "this led to," you're probably explaining rather than describing.

Source Comparison Questions

Comparison questions test your ability to identify agreements and disagreements between sources. Start with a clear overview: "Overall, sources X and Y agree/disagree about $topic$."

For each point of comparison, use: "Firstly, the sources agree/disagree about $specific aspect$. Source X states $quote$ and source Y states $quote/paraphrase$."

Repeat this pattern for your second point of comparison. You're essentially putting the sources in conversation with each other, showing where they align and where they conflict.

Don't just list what each source says separately - the examiner wants to see you actively comparing their viewpoints and identifying the relationship between them.

9-Mark Essay Questions

Start strong with an overview that lists your factors: "There were many $topic from question$ such as $list your factors$." This roadmap helps both you and the examiner follow your argument.

Structure each body paragraph as: "One $factor from question$. This means $explanation$. This also means $further development$." The double explanation shows deeper understanding.

Write three body paragraphs using "However, another $factor$" and "Another $factor$" to link them together. This creates a flowing argument rather than isolated points.

End with your judgement: "Overall $state your main factor$. This is because $summarise your strongest argument$." The examiner wants to see you can prioritise and make historical judgements.

Pro Tip: Your conclusion should feel inevitable based on the evidence you've presented, not like a surprise twist.

"Evaluate the Usefulness" Questions

Usefulness questions combine content analysis with source evaluation skills. Start with what makes the source useful: "The source is useful as it accurately states $quote$. This means $your interpretation in your own words$."

Repeat this pattern twice to show the source's strengths. Then identify weaknesses: "However, the source is less useful as it fails to mention $missing information from your knowledge$."

Finally, evaluate the source's context using PEAT: Purpose, Era, Author, Type. For each element, explain whether it makes the source more or less useful and why.

Remember that primary sources aren't automatically better than secondary ones - it depends on what you're investigating and what perspective you need for your historical enquiry.