Page 2: Continuation of Question 2 and Introduction to Question 3

This page continues the analysis for Question 2 and introduces the model answer for Question 3 of the AQA English Language Paper 2 November 2020 exam.

The Question 2 response further explores the differences between Simon and Marius, focusing on their communication styles and time management approaches. The answer highlights how Simon's no-nonsense attitude contrasts with Marius's more relaxed and hospitable demeanor.

Example: The text notes that Simon uses phrases like "right, let's do it again" and "nothing to wait for, come on," indicating a focus on efficiency, while Marius speaks "calmly" and allows Gertrude to "sleep for half an hour" at the summit.

The examiner report for Question 2 emphasizes the importance of making perceptive comparisons and using appropriate signposting to link back to the question.

Highlight: The student has signposted to the examiner by using phrases such as 'conversely' and 'difference' in order to link back to the question.

Question 3 focuses on language analysis, asking students to examine how the writer describes his feelings in Source A. The model answer demonstrates a sophisticated analysis of language techniques, including metaphors and alliteration.

Example: The metaphor "a wave of nausea and pain swept over me" is analyzed to show how it conveys the all-encompassing nature of the writer's pain.

The response explores the connotations and effects of specific word choices, demonstrating a deep understanding of how language is used to create impact and engage the reader.

Vocabulary: Alliteration - the repetition of the same sound at the beginning of a series of words in succession.

The analysis of alliteration in "three faint tugs trembled the taut rope" shows how the technique is used to reflect the writer's emotional state and create tension in the text.

This detailed approach to language analysis is crucial for achieving high marks in GCSE English Language Paper 2, particularly for students aiming for a Grade 9 performance.

Question 3 Language Analysis Part 1

This section showcases techniques required for How to get a 9 in GCSE English Language Paper 2 through detailed language analysis.

Vocabulary: Key literary terms explained include metaphor, alliteration, and connotation.

Example: The analysis of "a wave of nausea and pain swept over me" demonstrates how metaphors can convey physical sensations.

Highlight: The response shows how technical analysis can be linked to reader impact, essential for achieving top grades.

Question 3 Language Analysis Part 2

The continuation of the language analysis demonstrates the depth required for English Language Paper 2 model answers Grade 9.

Quote: "three faint tugs trembled the taut rope"

Definition: Alliteration is explained as a technique that creates rhythm and reflects the character's emotional state.

Highlight: The analysis shows how multiple language features work together to create meaning and impact.

Page 4: Tone and Emotional Language

This section examines how tone and emotive language are used differently in Sources A and B to convey the writers' experiences.

The analysis contrasts the negative emotional language in Source A with the calmer tone of Source B.

Vocabulary: "Emotive language" refers to words and phrases that evoke strong emotions.

Quote: "howling" and "screaming" are used to portray the intensity of pain

Highlight: The hyperbolic comparison to the devil in Source A demonstrates extreme emotional distress.

Page 1: Questions 1 and 2 Analysis

This page covers the model answers and examiner reports for Questions 1 and 2 of the AQA English Language Paper 2 November 2020 exam.

Question 1 assesses the ability to identify explicit information from the text. The model answer correctly selects the appropriate statements from the specified lines, demonstrating the skill of extracting relevant information.

Highlight: This question assesses the first part of AO1 - identify and interpret explicit and implicit information and ideas.

Question 2 requires a comparison between two sources, focusing on the differences between characters. The model answer provides a detailed analysis of the contrasts between Marius (Source B) and Simon (Source A), examining their roles, attitudes, and interactions with their companions.

Example: The answer highlights how Marius is described as a "local guide" who is paid for his services, while Simon is portrayed as a "companion" in a more equal partnership.

The response demonstrates effective use of textual evidence and analytical skills, making inferences about the characters based on their actions and dialogue.

Quote: "The simile in 'like a bear' directly compares Marius' strength to that of a bear, and the connotations of this are that Gertrude feels very secure that Marius' strength is sufficient to pull her up the mountain."

The examiner report emphasizes the importance of identifying and interpreting both explicit and implicit information, as well as synthesizing evidence from different texts.

Highlight: The answer uses textual detail from both sources, in the form of quotes, which provide evidence for their point.