Comparing Writers' Attitudes - Model Answer Analysis
Ever wondered how to write a top-level comparison response? This model answer demonstrates brilliant comparison techniques by examining how two writers present completely different attitudes towards elephants.
The response starts strongly by establishing contrasting characterisations - Orwell as "considerate and sympathetic" versus the other writer as "heartless" and motivated by capitalism. Notice how the student uses specific quotations like "no intention of shooting the elephant" and "it would be murder to shoot" to prove Orwell's moral stance.
The capitalism theme runs throughout the analysis, showing how the keeper treats Jumbo as a commodity rather than a living being. The student cleverly links this to how Jumbo was useful for carrying children (earning money) but becomes disposable when "troublesome and problematic".
Key technique alert: The response uses comparative connectives like "on the other hand" and "though in Source B" to maintain clear comparison structure throughout.
Top Tip: This answer scored 13/16 because it consistently compares rather than just describing each source separately - a common mistake that costs marks!