Women's Suffrage Movements Peaceful vs. Militant Approaches
The fight for women's suffrage in Britain took two distinct paths, each making significant contributions to achieving voting rights for women. The National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) maintained peaceful protests, while a more radical group emerged - the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU), known as the Suffragettes.
The Suffragettes, frustrated with the slow progress of peaceful demonstrations, adopted militant tactics to draw attention to their cause. They created a distinctive identity through their color scheme of green, white, and purple, which appeared on their medals and banners. These colors held symbolic meaning purple for dignity, white for purity, and green for hope. In contrast, the peaceful suffragists used green, white, and red in their campaigns.
One of the most powerful weapons in the Suffragette arsenal was the hunger strike, undertaken by imprisoned members. These women refused food as a protest against their incarceration and treatment. The government's response of force-feeding drew public sympathy and highlighted the determination of these activists. Their militant tactics, while controversial, succeeded in keeping women's suffrage at the forefront of public discourse.
Highlight The Suffragettes' militant approach and the suffragists' peaceful methods, though different, both contributed significantly to achieving women's voting rights. Their combined efforts led to the passage of the Representation of the People Act 1918, which granted voting rights to women over 30 who met certain property qualifications.