Values, Politics, and Social Problems
Here's the big question: should sociologists try to be completely neutral, or should they pick a side? Becker famously argued that researchers should "side with the underdogs" - basically, stick up for the people who don't have power in society.
Postmodernists like Lyotard go even further, claiming there's no such thing as objective truth anyway. They argue that all knowledge is just social construction, and saying some knowledge is "more scientific" is just a way for powerful groups to silence other voices.
But sociology isn't just academic navel-gazing. Giddens points out that sociological research serves four practical purposes: helping us understand the world, raising awareness about different groups' needs, working out which policies actually work, and increasing our knowledge about ourselves and others.
Think About It: If sociologists discover that certain social policies don't work or even make things worse, shouldn't they speak up rather than staying silent?
Bauman worries that if politicians ignore sociological findings about issues like poverty and welfare, society could get significantly worse. The question remains whether scientific methods in sociology help solve social problems or just create new ways to control people.