The Functionalist perspective on crime examines how criminal behavior serves various social functions and contributes to society's stability and evolution. This theoretical framework, developed by sociologists like Emile Durkheim, identifies the 4 functions of crime as boundary maintenance, adaptation and change, social cohesion, and employment creation.
According to Functionalist theory of crime examples, deviant behavior helps define moral boundaries within society by clarifying what is considered right and wrong. When people break laws, it reinforces societal values and brings communities together in their shared opposition to criminal acts. The theory also suggests that crime creates jobs in law enforcement, legal systems, and rehabilitation services. Strain and subcultural theories in criminology build on functionalist ideas by examining how social pressures and group dynamics lead to deviant behavior. Subcultural theory in criminology specifically looks at how marginalized groups develop their own values and norms that may conflict with mainstream society.
The strengths and weaknesses of Functionalist Theory of crime are widely debated. While it provides valuable insights into crime's social functions, critics argue it oversimplifies complex issues and ignores power dynamics. The Marxist view on crime contrasts by focusing on how economic inequality and class conflict drive criminal behavior. Common criticisms of functionalist view on crime and deviance include its tendency to justify crime's existence and overlook individual factors. Despite these limitations, functionalist theory remains influential in understanding how deviance relates to social order and change. Functions of crime sociology continues to examine both manifest and latent effects of criminal behavior on society's structure and development, making it a crucial perspective in criminological studies alongside other theoretical frameworks like strain theory and subcultural approaches.