Identity and Social Class (Continued)
The concept of an underclass remains highly controversial in British sociology. Critics like Murray describe a group dependent on welfare, living on council estates, characterised by long-term unemployment, single parenthood, and anti-social behaviour.
However, this view is heavily criticised. Jordan argues that people in poverty share the same values about work and family as everyone else - they want to work for respect and dignity. Unemployment brings shame, guilt, and poor mental health, not lifestyle choices.
Charlesworth's research shows how poverty creates low self-esteem that restricts ambitions, sometimes leading to drink, drugs, or anti-social behaviour as coping mechanisms. This isn't moral failure but a response to structural disadvantage.
Many sociologists argue social class is declining as a source of identity. Crook, Pakulski and Waters suggest young people have more choice and don't recognise class boundaries. Hybrid identities mixing different influences are becoming normal.
However, Bradley argues class inequality remains significant even if class identity has weakened. Gender, age, and ethnicity are increasingly important, but consumption patterns still largely depend on income linked to social class.
Critical Thinking: Is being poor really a choice? Consider factors like disability, illness, economic recession, and lack of opportunities before making judgements about people's circumstances.