Media and Global Culture
This section examines the relationship between media and global culture, exploring various perspectives on globalisation's impact on cultural practices and media consumption.
Globalisation and Media
Lechner & Boli (2012) present two main views on media and globalisation:
- Globalisation as a process of connecting people across distance and time
- Globalisation as a mechanism for capitalism to thrive, spreading cultural dominance and profit worldwide
Highlight: The debate surrounding globalisation's impact on culture is ongoing, with differing viewpoints on its effects and implications.
Perspectives on Mass Culture
Macdonald (1957) criticizes mass culture, arguing that it:
- Lacks meaning and appeals to the lowest common denominator
- Doesn't challenge people or provoke strong responses
- May lead to the media ignoring other cultures' food, language, and music
- Could result in totalitarianism, with media controlling views without being questioned
In contrast, Strinati (2004) defends mass culture, stating that:
- The audience is active and makes judgments about the media they consume
- Critics of mass culture favor high culture and see alternatives as threats
- Mass culture offers diverse tastes, styles, and opinions that evolve with society
Globalisation and Cultural Homogenization
Flew (2002) argues that new media forms have created a global culture based on technology, reaching global audiences instantly. This leads to media homogenization as cultural differences and products are shared globally.
Quote: "Emerging forms of new media have created a global culture as it's based in technology and can reach a global audience instantly." - Flew (2002)
Fenton (1999) takes a Marxist perspective, suggesting that global culture primarily means Western culture. This view introduces the concept of cultural imperialism, where globalisation spreads ruling class ideology worldwide.




