Strengths and Weaknesses of Situation Ethics
Situation Ethics offers remarkable flexibility, allowing you to apply the principle of love to vastly different circumstances without being trapped by outdated rules. The concept of agape is universal - you don't need to be Christian to understand loving your neighbour, making it accessible across cultures and beliefs.
Many find it easy to follow because it's intuitive - most people instinctively understand what loving action looks like in a given situation. This makes moral decision-making feel more natural and less legalistic.
However, critics argue it's too subjective, failing to provide clear, absolute guidance when you need it most. You can't apply every principle to every situation, and different people might reach conflicting conclusions about what constitutes "loving" action.
The "ends justify the means" approach particularly concerns traditionalists, as it could potentially justify terrible actions if they produce good outcomes. Some situations aren't actually unique, so established moral wisdom might be more valuable than Fletcher suggests.
Food for Thought: Consider whether flexibility in ethics is liberating or dangerous - does removing moral absolutes help or harm society?