Defining Abnormality
Ever wondered what makes something "abnormal" in psychology? There are four main ways to define it, each with strengths and limitations.
Statistical infrequency defines abnormality as behaviour that falls in the extreme 2.5% of the population. While objective and straightforward, it risks overlooking common problems like depression because they aren't statistically rare.
Deviation from social norms focuses on behaviours that violate society's unwritten rules. This approach recognises that what's normal varies between cultures and situations, but cultural relativism makes it difficult to apply universally.
Failure to function adequately looks at someone's inability to cope with everyday demands. This takes into account subjective experiences but can lead to misdiagnosis as symptoms present differently in different people.
Deviation from ideal mental health uses Jahoda's principles (self-actualisation, environmental mastery, resistance to stress). It's the only positive, holistic approach, though some argue its criteria are unrealistically high.
Think about it: When Bina shows depression symptoms and can't function at work, different definitions would classify her differently. Statistical infrequency might see her as "normal" since depression is common, while failure to function and deviation from social norms would classify her as "abnormal."







