Research Evidence and Limitations
Strong research support comes from cases like Patient Tan, who could only say "tan" due to left frontal lobe damage, and Phineas Gage, whose personality changed after frontal lobe injury. These cases clearly link specific brain damage to particular functional losses.
However, modern research reveals complications. Dronkers' MRI scans of Tan's brain found additional damaged areas beyond Broca's region, suggesting speech production involves multiple brain areas working together.
The theory also ignores brain connectivity. Dejerine's patient lost reading ability due to severed connections between brain areas, not damage to a specific region. This reduces the credibility of strict localisation.
Individual differences pose another challenge. Bavelier's brain scanning studies showed people use different brain areas for the same tasks, suggesting localisation patterns vary between individuals.
The main limitations are oversimplification, ignoring connections between brain regions, and not accounting for individual differences in brain organisation.
Bottom Line: Localisation theory provides a useful framework but real brain function is more complex and interconnected than originally thought.