Evaluating Explanations of Obedience

This page evaluates the strengths and limitations of the legitimacy of authority and agentic state theories as explanations for obedience in A Level Psychology.

Supporting Evidence for Legitimacy of Authority

Research supports the legitimacy of authority explanation:

Example: In a study where students watched Milgram's experiment, they attributed responsibility to the experimenter rather than participants, citing legitimate and expert authority as reasons.

This evidence suggests that people recognize legitimacy of authority as a valid cause of obedience.

Cultural Differences in Obedience

The legitimacy of authority explanation effectively accounts for cultural variations in obedience:

Highlight: Cross-cultural studies show significant differences in obedience levels, such as 16% compliance in Australia versus 85% in Germany.

This strength demonstrates the explanation's external validity and ability to explain diverse research findings.

Limitations of Agentic State Theory

The agentic state theory has limitations in explaining certain research outcomes:

1. It cannot account for participants who disobeyed in Milgram's study.
2. It fails to explain the lack of anxiety in nurses in Hofling et al.'s study, contrary to predictions.

These limitations suggest that the agentic state theory may only apply to specific obedience situations, reducing its overall validity.

Real-World Applications

Both explanations have significant real-world applications, enhancing their relevance:

Example: The My Lai Massacre (1968) during the Vietnam War can be understood using these theories, particularly in relation to military hierarchy and the defense of "following orders."

This application demonstrates the external validity of both explanations in understanding real-life instances of destructive obedience.

Conclusion and Further Considerations

This page concludes the discussion on social psychological explanations of obedience and provides additional insights for AQA A Level Psychology students.

Strengths of Both Explanations

The legitimacy of authority and agentic state theories offer valuable insights into obedience:

1. They provide a framework for understanding complex social behaviors.
2. Both theories have real-world applications, particularly in explaining war crimes and institutional obedience.
3. They contribute to our understanding of how social structures influence individual behavior.

Limitations and Considerations

While these explanations are useful, it's important to consider their limitations:

1. They may not fully account for individual differences in obedience.
2. The theories might oversimplify complex social interactions.
3. Cultural and historical contexts can influence the applicability of these explanations.

Highlight: A comprehensive understanding of obedience requires considering multiple theories and their interactions.

Implications for Further Study

For AQA A Level Psychology students, these explanations open up several areas for further exploration:

1. The role of personal responsibility in obedience situations
2. The interaction between situational and dispositional factors in obedience
3. Ethical considerations in obedience research and its applications

Example: Studying modern examples of obedience, such as corporate whistleblowing or social media influence, could provide new insights into these theories.

Exam Preparation Tips

When preparing for AQA A Level Psychology exams on this topic:

1. Practice applying these theories to various scenarios, both historical and contemporary.
2. Develop critical evaluation skills by comparing and contrasting these explanations.
3. Stay updated on recent research that might support or challenge these theories.

Vocabulary: Dispositional explanation - An approach that focuses on individual personality traits as factors in obedience.

Understanding these explanations of obedience is crucial for developing a comprehensive view of social influence in psychology.