Tensions Within Liberalism
Here's where liberalism gets properly interesting - it's basically having an identity crisis. Classical liberalism champions laissez-faire capitalism and minimal state intervention, believing individual freedom flourishes when government stays out of the way. Think negative freedom - removing barriers rather than actively helping.
Modern liberalism emerged because many felt free-market capitalism wasn't delivering freedom for everyone. Instead of egotistical individualism, they promote developmental individualism - the idea that humans can be altruistic and work for social progress.
The economic divide is massive: classical liberals want pure free markets, whilst modern liberals embrace Keynesianism with active state intervention to prevent economic collapse. Classical liberals believe wealth will 'trickle down' naturally, but modern liberals aren't willing to wait around for that to maybe happen.
Despite these tensions, both strands agree on core principles: tolerance, equality of opportunity, and the need for limited government with proper checks and balances. They just massively disagree on how to achieve these goals.
Key Point: The fundamental tension is whether true liberty comes from minimal state interference or active government intervention to level the playing field.