Understanding Judicial Precedent
Judicial precedent occurs when a judge creates or clarifies a law that future judges must follow. This concept is fundamental to the UK legal system and goes by several names:
- Case law
- Common law
- Precedent
The Doctrine of Precedent
The core principle behind judicial precedent is stare decisis – Latin for "to stand by past decisions and not unsettle the established." This doctrine:
- Promotes fairness and certainty in the legal system
- Requires present cases to follow decisions made in similar past cases
- Mandates courts to follow decisions from higher courts in the hierarchy
Types of Judicial Precedent
-
Original precedent: Created when judges establish a new law on a previously undecided point of law
- Example: Schweppes Ltd case
- Judges may look at similar cases for guidance (reasoning by analogy)
-
Binding precedent: Must be followed by judges in subsequent similar cases
- Example: Automatic Telephone case
- Only created when there's a similar case
- Made and followed by the same or higher courts which lower courts must follow
-
Persuasive precedent: Judges may choose to use it but aren't obligated to follow
- Sources include:
- Courts lower in the hierarchy
- Decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
- Obiter dicta (statements made in passing)
- Dissenting judgments
- Decisions from courts in other countries
- Sources include:
Key Concept: Court Hierarchy The UK court system operates on a strict hierarchy where every court must follow decisions made by courts above them, and courts typically follow their own past decisions. The exception occurs in cases involving human rights.
































