Electoral System in the Nineteenth Century
The early 19th century electoral system in Britain was characterized by significant inequalities and limitations. Who could vote in 19th century Britain was heavily restricted, with power concentrated in the hands of the king and major landowners.
Key features of the system included:
- Lack of representation for workers in new towns and cities
- Existence of "rotten boroughs" that sent MPs to parliament despite having no residents
- "Pocket boroughs" controlled by wealthy individuals
- Exclusion of women from voting
- Absence of secret ballots, leading to voter intimidation and bribery
- Inconsistent property qualifications for voting rights
Vocabulary: Rotten boroughs were constituencies with very few voters that still elected MPs to Parliament, while pocket boroughs were effectively controlled by wealthy patrons.
The Tory party, representing the landed class, resisted reform efforts. However, the election of the Whig party in 1830, led by Earl Grey, and the ascension of King William IV created an environment more conducive to change.
Highlight: The lack of representation led to the growth of the Chartist Movement among working men, pushing for political reform.
The Peterloo Massacre
A significant event in the push for reform was the Peterloo Massacre in 1819. What happened at the Peterloo Massacre was a tragic turning point:
- 60,000 workers gathered in Manchester to hear Henry Hunt speak about parliamentary reform
- Local magistrates, fearing the crowd, called in the militia
- Within minutes, over 600 people were injured and 15 killed
- Hunt was arrested and imprisoned
Quote: "After Peterloo, the Six Acts were introduced. They stated that any meeting of more than 50 people for radical reform was an act of treason."
The massacre did not bring immediate change but intensified the desire for reform among the working and middle classes.