This section focuses on how to answer describe questions in N5 history, providing a clear structure for 4-mark questions. The guide emphasizes a four-paragraph approach, each starting with a specific transition word.

Structure for describe questions:

1. Firstly
2. Secondly
3. Also
4. Lastly

Highlight: The guide recommends completing these questions within 3 minutes, emphasizing the importance of time management in exams.

A model answer is provided, demonstrating how to describe the methods used to recruit Scottish soldiers in the Great War. This example showcases how to incorporate specific historical details and examples into each paragraph.

Example: "Firstly, propaganda posters were used to encourage Scottish men to volunteer, for example, posters showing soldiers in kilts."

This structured approach helps students organize their thoughts and present information clearly and concisely, which is crucial for success in GCSE history skills questions.

This page guides students on how to answer explain questions in N5 history, focusing on 6-mark questions. The guide introduces the ABC structure: Answer, Because, Comment.

Definition: ABC Structure - A method for organizing explanations in history answers: A - Answer the question directly B - Because $give a reason$ C - Comment with specific historical details

The guide provides a model paragraph demonstrating this structure, explaining one reason why many Scots volunteered to fight in 1914. It emphasizes the need for specific historical details and examples.

Example: "The white feather campaign was one reason many Scots volunteered to fight because women would guilt men into signing up by handing out white feathers to show cowardice to men who had not yet signed up, particularly in Edinburgh."

Highlight: Students are advised to complete these 6-mark questions within 8 minutes, reinforcing the importance of time management in exams.

This structured approach helps students craft clear, detailed explanations for historical events and phenomena, a key skill for success in N5 history skills questions.

This section provides guidance on how to answer comparison questions in N5 history. The guide outlines a structured approach to analyzing and comparing historical sources effectively.

Key steps in source comparison:

1. Highlight quotations that relate to each other
2. Identify whether the quotations agree or disagree
3. Develop the comparison with quotes

Highlight: The guide emphasizes the importance of using key phrases in comparisons, such as "Overall, Sources A and B agree/disagree about..."

The structure for comparison answers is presented as:

1. Overall statement
2. Simple comparison
3. Developed comparison with quotes $2-3 times$

Vocabulary: Comparison - The process of examining similarities and differences between two or more historical sources.

This approach helps students tackle 4-mark comparison questions effectively, demonstrating their ability to analyze and interpret multiple historical sources.

Example: "As Source A states... while Source B argues... This shows that the sources disagree about..."

The guide recommends completing these questions within 5 minutes, reinforcing the importance of time management in exams.

This page focuses on how to answer 9-mark questions in N5 history, which are essentially mini-essays. The guide provides a clear structure for these longer-form responses and explains the marking criteria.

Essay structure:

1. Introduction - background fact, factors to be discussed
2. Factor in question - explain why it's important
3. Alternative factors - discuss with "However"
4. Conclusion - make a judgment and provide supporting evidence

Highlight: The marking scheme allocates points for multiple factors, knowledge points, evidence, and a well-supported conclusion.

The guide identifies three types of mini-essay questions:

1. "To what extent" - choose the most important factor
2. "How important" - select the most significant factor
3. "How successful" - make a judgment on success or failure

Example: "To what extent was the tank the most effective weapon on the Western Front? $9 marks$"

This structured approach helps students organize their thoughts and present a well-argued response to complex historical questions, a crucial skill for success in N5 history skills questions.

This final section guides students on how to answer "how fully" questions in N5 history, typically worth 6 marks. The guide provides a structured approach to analyzing sources and supplementing them with additional knowledge.

Key steps:

1. Highlight quotations relevant to the question
2. Identify if the question requires explanation or description
3. Make a judgment on how fully the source answers the question

Structure for "how fully" answers:

1. Judgment $1-3 marks for using the source$
2. Quote and explain $3 times$
3. Missing points $up to 4 marks for own knowledge$

Highlight: Marks can be capped at 2/6 if there's no judgment or only a partial explanation/description from the source.

Key phrases to use:

• "Source A partly explains/describes..."
• "Source A states..."
• "This shows that..."
• "However, Source A fails to mention..."

Example: "Source A partly explains the causes of World War I. It states that 'the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the immediate trigger.' This shows that international tensions were high. However, Source A fails to mention the arms race between European powers, which was also a significant factor."

This approach helps students demonstrate their ability to analyze sources critically and supplement them with their own historical knowledge, a key skill for success in N5 history skills questions.

This page outlines the process for evaluating usefulness in N5 history, a crucial skill for history students. The guide provides a step-by-step approach to analyzing historical sources effectively.

The evaluation process involves examining the source's contents, author, and time of writing. Students are instructed to highlight relevant quotes, explain the content, and consider the source's origin and context.

Highlight: The evaluation process is broken down into 6 key steps, making it easier for students to approach this complex task systematically.

Vocabulary: Primary Source - A source created during the time period being studied. Secondary Source - A source created after the event, often with the benefit of hindsight.

The guide emphasizes the importance of using key phrases in responses, such as "This is useful because..." for accurate information, and "This is less useful because..." when identifying omissions.

Example: When evaluating author credibility, students might write: "The author is useful because they are an expert on the subject."

This structured approach helps students tackle the 5-mark question on source evaluation comprehensively and effectively.