Goat Aid: A Bottom-Up Approach to Food Security

The Goat Aid project, implemented in the Babati district of northern Tanzania, serves as an excellent example of a bottom-up approach to improving food security. This area, where 90% of the population lives in villages and depends on agriculture for their livelihood, was the focus of a UK-based charity's efforts between 1999 and 2006.

The project involved importing Toggenburg goats at a cost of £400 each, with the aim of improving household nutrition and income for villagers. This initiative demonstrates the impact of goat aid in Tanzania on local communities.

Highlight: The Goat Aid project in Babati district aimed to improve household nutrition and income by introducing Toggenburg goats to local communities.

Advantages of the Goat Aid project included:

• Ability to buy food
• Payment of medical expenses and school fees
• Building and repairing houses
• Buying land
• Improving crop farming
• Increasing flock size
• Repairing goat houses

However, the project also had some disadvantages, primarily the need for the initial investment to be paid back.

Vocabulary: Toggenburg goats are a Swiss dairy goat breed known for their high milk production.

The page also mentions other important concepts related to food security in Tanzania:

• Commercial and subsistence farming
• Global Hunger Index
• Environmental concerns such as pollution from boat fuel
• Ester Boserup's theory on agricultural intensification

Definition: The Global Hunger Index (GHI) is a tool designed to comprehensively measure and track hunger at global, regional, and national levels.

Assessing Food Security Projects in Tanzania

This section evaluates the success of past and present projects aimed at improving food security in Tanzania. It provides a critical analysis of these Tanzania agriculture development projects and their impacts on the country's food security situation.

The Canada Wheat Project in Tanzania is presented as an example of a past project. While it was successful in producing about 60% of Tanzania's wheat by covering 26,400 hectares in northern Tanzania, it also had significant drawbacks:

Quote: "On the other hand, the project wasn't a success because the yield was mostly low. This means that it actually would've been cheaper to import the wheat from other countries."

This critique highlights the importance of efficiency and cost-effectiveness in agricultural development projects. Despite increasing wheat production, the project's low yields made it less economically viable than importing wheat, ultimately not improving food security as intended.

The document then introduces SAGCOT (Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania), a present-day project started in 2010. This large-scale initiative aims to improve farming in Tanzania through a growth corridor from east to west, connected to the port at Dar es Salaam by main road and the TAZARA railway.

Vocabulary: SAGCOT stands for Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania, a large-scale agricultural development project.

SAGCOT's approach includes:

• A hub and out-grower model
• Improving irrigation, seeds, local transport, and storage facilities
• Building processing facilities for crops like tobacco and sunflowers

While SAGCOT has seen some successes, such as increased farm incomes and the construction of processing facilities, it also faces challenges:

Highlight: Most of the money invested in SAGCOT benefits large commercial farms, while nomadic tribes have lost access to free water sources.

This critique of SAGCOT underscores the complex nature of large-scale agricultural development projects and their potential to create both positive and negative impacts on different segments of the population. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive and inclusive approaches to food security that consider the needs of all community members, including vulnerable groups like nomadic tribes.