Jekyll's Transformation and Societal Critique
As the story progresses, how Jekyll is presented at the end of the novel becomes increasingly complex. The Carew murder case reveals that it was Jekyll, not Hyde, who committed the horrific assault, challenging the notion of Hyde as the sole embodiment of evil.
Highlight: The attack on Carew, a middle-class man wandering late at night, is presented as Jekyll's reaction to societal hypocrisy, particularly regarding the criminalization of homosexuality.
Stevenson uses this incident to critique the duality in Jekyll and Hyde quotes and analysis, showing how repression of natural instincts can lead to violent outbursts. The author challenges the Victorian idea that humans can be purely good or evil, instead suggesting a more nuanced view of human nature.
Quote: "Stevenson does this to show how we wanted this ideology to be abolished just as Carew was."
The novella concludes with Jekyll's will, stating that Hyde should take his place "without further delay" if he disappears. This symbolism in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde represents Stevenson's rejection of Victorian society and its moral constraints.
Definition: Duplicity - The state of being double; the use of deceptive behavior or speech.
In conclusion, Stevenson presents Jekyll as a vehicle for critiquing societal norms and exploring the complexities of human nature. The themes in Jekyll and Hyde revolve around the dangers of repressing natural instincts and the hypocrisy of a society that outwardly condemns vices while secretly indulging in them. Through Jekyll's character, Stevenson argues that humans are inherently a combination of good and evil, and denying this duality leads to disastrous consequences.



