Critical Reactions and Female Agency
British critics were particularly divided about the play's impact. Conservative writer Clement Scott dismissed it in 1889, claiming English audiences would never accept Nora's radical theories about marriage and independence. Yet Danish playwright Erich Bogh praised its artistic mastery, noting how it achieved dramatic power without melodramatic tricks.
Female performers and critics saw something revolutionary in Ibsen's work. Elizabeth Robins, the first actress to play Hedda Gabler, wrote passionately about having "glorious actable stuff" that treated women as complex characters rather than simple stereotypes.
The play's focus on ordinary, relatable characters - "people one meets in the city" - made it particularly powerful. Critics like A.B. Walkley recognised that modern drama depended on women's stories, though others dismissed Ibsen's female characters as "unwomanly" and "unsexed."
💡 Key Point: The play's realistic portrayal of women's inner lives threatened traditional gender expectations, dividing critics along ideological lines.