Explorers or boys messing about? By Steven Morris
Steven Morris's article from The Guardian questions whether two men rescued from Antarctica were serious explorers or just reckless thrill-seekers who wasted taxpayer money. The writer's subtle bias makes this an interesting study in persuasive journalism.
Morris structures his article using very short paragraphs typical of newspaper writing, quickly establishing the 5Ws (who, what, when, where, why) before providing background on the men and their failed expedition. This concise approach allows him to pack in facts while maintaining a fast-paced, engaging style.
The title itself reveals Morris's skepticism with its dismissive phrase "boys messing about," immediately undercutting the men's credentials. Throughout the article, Morris contrasts evidence that suggests they were experienced explorers (with "expeditions to 70 countries" and "satellite phones") with details that make them seem unprepared ("there was confusion about what the men were trying to achieve").
One of the most effective techniques Morris employs is using quotes from experts and even one of the explorers' wives who refers to them as "boys messing about with a helicopter." This allows Morris to express criticism without stating it directly himself.
Exam tip: When analyzing this text, pay attention to how Morris balances factual reporting with subtle judgment. The article appears balanced but actually leads readers toward seeing the men as irresponsible through careful word choices and selection of quotes.