Robert Louis Stevenson's masterpiece sets the stage for one of literature's most famous explorations of good versus evil. The title itself hints at the mystery you're about to uncover - why is Dr Jekyll's case considered "strange"?

This Gothic novella was written during the Victorian era, when society was obsessed with maintaining proper appearances whilst hiding darker impulses. Stevenson taps into these fears brilliantly.

The story unfolds through multiple perspectives, creating a puzzle that slowly reveals its shocking truth. You'll find yourself as intrigued as the characters trying to solve the mystery.

Key Point: The title suggests this isn't just any story about Jekyll - it's specifically about a "case," hinting at the investigative, almost detective-like nature of the narrative.

Meet Mr Utterson, your guide through this dark tale. He's a lawyer who's described as having a "rugged countenance" and being rather serious, but there's something genuinely lovable about him despite his stern exterior.

Utterson's character represents Victorian respectability - he's reserved, loyal, and doesn't judge others harshly. The narrator tells us he has a policy of helping friends without imposing his own moral standards on them, making him the perfect person to uncover shocking secrets.

His friendship with Mr Enfield might seem odd to outsiders, but their weekly walks together are precious to both men. They barely talk during these strolls, yet they wouldn't miss them for anything.

During one of these Sunday walks, they encounter a mysterious door that will change everything. This door becomes central to the story's dark revelations.

Victorian Insight: Utterson represents the ideal Victorian gentleman - discreet, loyal, and professional, which makes him trustworthy enough to handle Jekyll's secrets.

The mysterious building stands out like a sore thumb on an otherwise pleasant street. While the neighbourhood thrives with well-maintained shops, this particular building looks neglected and sinister - no windows, just a battered door that's seen years of abuse.

Enfield's disturbing story begins here. Late one winter night, he witnessed something horrifying: a small man deliberately trampled over a young girl and left her screaming on the ground. The callousness was shocking - "it wasn't like a man; it was like some damned Juggernaut."

What's particularly unsettling is how everyone instantly hated this man on sight. Even a typically unemotional doctor felt sick looking at him and wanted him dead. There was something fundamentally wrong with this person that went beyond normal human nastiness.

The trampler showed no remorse whatsoever. Instead, he remained coldly calculating, agreeing to pay compensation to avoid scandal - revealing that even in his wickedness, he understood Victorian society's obsession with reputation.

Literary Device: The contrast between the pleasant street and the sinister building mirrors the story's theme of respectable appearances hiding dark secrets.

Here's where things get properly weird. The mysterious trampler produced a cheque from a completely respectable gentleman - someone known for doing good works and having an impeccable reputation.

Enfield immediately suspected blackmail. How else could such a detestable person have access to a good man's money? He even nicknamed the building "Black Mail House" because the situation seemed so obviously corrupt.

The cheque was genuine, which made everything more disturbing. This wasn't forgery - it was a real connection between respectability and evil that nobody could explain.

Victorian society's hypocrisy emerges as a key theme. The idea that respectable gentlemen might be paying for "capers of his youth" reflects how the era's strict moral codes often created secret lives and hidden shames.

Historical Context: Blackmail was a serious concern in Victorian society, where reputation meant everything and scandals could destroy lives completely.

Enfield reveals the name that will haunt the rest of the story: Hyde. This moment marks when the mystery transforms from a random street incident into something far more sinister and personal.

The building itself remains puzzling - it hardly seems like a proper house, with only one door and windows that are always shut. Someone clearly lives there (the chimney smokes), but it's almost like a secret hideaway.

Enfield's philosophy about not asking too many questions reflects Victorian discretion, but it also shows how society's politeness could enable terrible secrets. His metaphor about questions being like stones that start avalanches is particularly clever.

When Utterson asks for Hyde's name, you can sense this isn't casual curiosity. The lawyer's reaction suggests he knows something that makes this information deeply troubling rather than merely interesting.

Foreshadowing: Utterson's specific interest in Hyde's name and his knowledge of "the other party" hints that he's already connected to this mystery in ways we don't yet understand.

Hyde's physical description is brilliantly unsettling because it's so vague. Enfield can't pinpoint what's wrong with him, just that there's "something displeasing, something down-right detestable" about his appearance. This suggests the problem isn't physical deformity but something deeper and more disturbing.

The revelation of Jekyll's will explains Utterson's concern perfectly. Dr Henry Jekyll - clearly a man of great learning and reputation (look at all those impressive letters after his name) - has left everything to Edward Hyde, including a bizarre clause about "disappearance or unexplained absence."

This will has always bothered Utterson as both a lawyer and a sensible man. Now that he knows Hyde is a violent, detestable person, his "indignation" has turned to genuine fear. The respectable Dr Jekyll is somehow connected to the monster who trampled a child.

The lawyer's decision to visit Dr Lanyon shows his methodical approach to solving this mystery. If anyone knows Jekyll's secrets, it would be an old friend from school and college days.

Character Analysis: Jekyll's academic credentials (M.D., D.C.L., L.L.D., F.R.S.) emphasise how shocking it is that such a learned, respectable man would be connected to someone like Hyde.

Dr Lanyon's character provides a stark contrast to the mystery surrounding Jekyll and Hyde. He's described as "hearty, healthy" and "boisterous" - everything Jekyll apparently isn't anymore.

The friendship between Utterson and Lanyon shows how Victorian gentlemen maintained lifelong bonds from school days. Their comfortable relationship demonstrates the kind of trust and respect that makes Jekyll's secretiveness even more troubling.

Jekyll and Lanyon's falling out centres on scientific disagreements. Lanyon calls Jekyll's work "unscientific balderdash" and suggests Jekyll has "gone wrong in mind." This hints that Jekyll's experiments might be the key to understanding his connection with Hyde.

Lanyon has never heard of Hyde, which is significant. If Jekyll had a legitimate protégé or assistant, his old friend would surely know about it. This suggests Hyde's relationship with Jekyll is secret and probably shameful.

Scientific Context: The Victorian era saw rapid advances in science that often challenged religious and moral beliefs, creating tension between traditional values and new discoveries.

Utterson's rational mind versus his imagination creates the story's psychological tension beautifully. During the day, he can control his thoughts about Hyde, but at night, his imagination runs wild with disturbing possibilities.

The lawyer's nightmares are particularly effective because they're so vivid. He dreams of Hyde moving through London's streets "like a Juggernaut," repeatedly trampling children, but the figure has no face - making it even more terrifying and mysterious.

This facelessness in dreams represents how evil can seem incomprehensible and inhuman. Hyde has become less a person than a symbol of pure malevolence in Utterson's mind.

Utterson's determination to see Hyde's face shows his belief that rational observation can solve any mystery. His pun "If he be Mr. Hyde, I shall be Mr. Seek" reveals both his methodical nature and his growing obsession with solving this puzzle.

Psychological Insight: Stevenson brilliantly shows how mysteries can consume our minds, especially when they involve people we care about - Utterson's obsession grows because Jekyll matters to him.

Utterson's transformation into "Mr. Seek" shows how the mystery has completely captivated him. This isn't just professional concern anymore - it's become a personal mission that's affecting his sleep and peace of mind.

The lawyer's confidence in rational solutions reflects typical Victorian faith in logic and observation. He believes that once he sees Hyde properly, he'll understand the mystery and be able to help Jekyll escape whatever hold this man has over him.

Stevenson uses this moment to highlight how the story challenges Victorian assumptions about reason conquering all. Sometimes, as we'll discover, rational examination only makes mysteries deeper and more disturbing.

The chapter ends with Utterson's determination, setting up the inevitable confrontation between the respectable lawyer and the mysterious Hyde.

Theme Development: This marks the point where intellectual curiosity becomes personal obsession, showing how evil can corrupt even those trying to fight it.

Hyde's first reaction to meeting Utterson is telling - he shrinks back "with a hissing intake of breath" like a cornered animal. Even though his fear is "only momentary," it shows he has reason to be wary of Jekyll's friends.

The conversation reveals Hyde's suspicious nature and quick temper. When Utterson asks to see his face, Hyde initially hesitates but then complies "with an air of defiance," suggesting he's both clever and confrontational.

Hyde's anger about Jekyll is particularly interesting. When Utterson mentions their "common friends," Hyde immediately focuses on Jekyll and becomes furious at the suggestion that Jekyll described him to others. This possessive rage hints at the true nature of their relationship.

Utterson's unusual behaviour during this encounter shows how much the mystery has affected him. He's normally truthful and straightforward, but here he plays mind games with Hyde, suggesting the lawyer is becoming somewhat corrupted by his involvement in this dark affair.

Character Revelation: Hyde's combination of animal-like fear, cold calculation, and explosive anger creates a portrait of someone fundamentally different from normal human beings.