Judicial Processes of Law-Making in the UK
The judicial law making UK process complements the parliamentary system, allowing judges to contribute to the development of law through precedent and statutory interpretation.
Judicial Precedent
Judicial precedent is a cornerstone of the UK legal system, where law-making is based on past judges' decisions. This system creates consistency, certainty, and fairness in the Common Law.
Definition: Common Law - A body of law developed through judicial decisions rather than through statutes or constitutions.
The Court Hierarchy
The court hierarchy plays a crucial role in establishing binding precedents:
- Supreme Court (highest)
- Crown Court
- Magistrate's Court (lowest)
Decisions made in higher courts create binding precedents that lower courts must follow in similar cases.
Exceptions to Precedent
There are two main exceptions to following precedent:
- Distinguishing: When a judge determines that the current case has different legal principles or facts from the precedent.
- Overruling: When a higher court states that a lower court's decision was incorrect and overturns it.
Statutory Interpretation
Judges also contribute to law-making through their interpretation of statutes or Acts of Parliament. There are three main rules of statutory interpretation:
- The Literal Rule: Judges use everyday, ordinary meanings of words in the statute.
Example: In R v Maginnis (1987), judges found different meanings for the word 'supply'.
- The Golden Rule: Allows modification of literal meanings to avoid absurd results.
Example: In Adler v George (1964), the court used the golden rule to interpret the Official Secrets Act 1920 to avoid an absurd outcome.
- The Mischief Rule: Allows the court to enforce the statute's intent rather than its literal wording.
Example: In Corkery v Carpenter (1951), the court interpreted 'carriage' in the Licensing Act (1872) to include a bicycle, focusing on the Act's intention to regulate all forms of transport.
These judicial processes of law-making demonstrate the dynamic nature of the UK legal system, allowing for both consistency through precedent and flexibility through interpretation.




