Case Studies: Applying the Models
This page presents case studies that illustrate the application of the crime control model and due process model in real-world scenarios. These examples help demonstrate the practical implications of each approach to criminal justice.
The Barry George/Jill Dando case provides insights into both models:
Example: In the due process model, the police investigation was thorough, and Barry was allowed to appeal his conviction, with decisions being challenged.
Example: In the crime control model, Barry was targeted because he fit the profile of a loner, and his conviction was based on a single particle of gunshot residue. He faced imprisonment, failed appeals, and received no compensation.
The Colin Stagg/Rachel Nickell case further illustrates the differences between the two models:
Example: In the due process model, the judge threw out the case due to improperly obtained evidence (the "honey trap" technique).
Example: In the crime control model, Colin was targeted as he fit the profile of a "loner," and undercover officers were used to try to extract a confession.
These case studies highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each model, demonstrating how they can lead to different outcomes in criminal investigations and trials.
Highlight: The application of these models in real cases shows that while the crime control model may lead to quicker arrests and convictions, it can also result in wrongful convictions. Conversely, the due process model may protect individual rights but can sometimes allow guilty individuals to avoid conviction due to procedural technicalities.
