Just Sentencing and Miscarriages of Justice
Just sentencing means punishments that actually fit the crime. Magistrates use sentencing guidelines to keep things consistent, but sometimes they get it spectacularly wrong. Stuart Hall's initial 15-month sentence for 14 counts of child sexual abuse was so inadequate that it had to be increased to 30 months after public outcry.
The 2011 London riots show how moral panic can swing sentences too far the other way. Two men got four years in prison just for posting on Facebook about riots, whilst another received 18 months for having a stolen TV - sentences that were completely disproportionate to the actual crimes.
Miscarriages of justice occur when innocent people get convicted and later cleared. The Birmingham Six case is a prime example - six men spent 16 years in prison for pub bombings they didn't commit. Police fabricated evidence and suppressed crucial information that could have proved their innocence.
Sally Clark's case demonstrates how expert testimony can go wrong. She was wrongly convicted of murdering her two sons based on misleading statistical evidence and undisclosed pathology findings, only being freed after a second appeal in 2003.
Remember: These cases led to important legal reforms, including changes to double jeopardy laws and improved guidelines for expert witnesses.