Theories on Gender and Crime
This page examines contrasting theories about why official statistics show such large gender differences in crime rates and how the criminal justice system treats male and female offenders.
The chivalry thesis, proposed by Pollak in 1950, argues that women receive more lenient treatment in the criminal justice system. This theory suggests that because men, who make up most of the CJS, are socialized to be protective of women, female offenders may be less likely to be prosecuted or may receive lighter sentences.
Definition: Chivalry thesis - The idea that women receive more lenient treatment in the criminal justice system due to protective attitudes from men.
Some studies provide evidence supporting this view:
- Graham & Bowling (1995) found self-reported offending showed smaller gender gaps than official statistics.
- Flood-Page et al (2000) found female offenders were less likely to be cautioned or prosecuted than males.
- Court statistics show females are more likely to get bail or non-custodial sentences.
However, the chivalry thesis is contested. The double deviance thesis argues women may actually be treated more harshly for violating both legal and gender norms. Other research challenges the idea of widespread female offenders leniency in the criminal justice system:
- Self-report studies still show higher male offending across offense categories (Hales et al, 2009).
- Many crimes against women go unreported, like domestic violence (Yearnshire, 1997).
- There may be gendered double standards in how youth behavior is viewed (Sharpe, 2009).
Quote: "Magistrates' view of female defendants is based on stereotypical gender roles, not their actual offence." - Stewart (2006)


























