Evaluating the Biological Approach
The biological approach has some serious strengths, but it's definitely not perfect - and understanding its limitations is crucial for your exams.
Scientific credibility is its biggest strength. Studies like Raine's use proper PET scans and replicable methods, whilst drug therapy research involves controlled trials with measurable results. This isn't just theory - it's hard science that other researchers can verify and build upon.
The approach's deterministic nature allows early intervention. If we know someone's genetically predisposed to schizophrenia, we can potentially prevent it with early treatment. Successful applications are everywhere - Vigurea found 60% success rates treating bipolar disorder with Lithium.
However, it's massively reductionist, boiling down complex human behaviour to simple chemical equations. Mental illness usually involves multiple factors, not just neurotransmitter imbalances. The approach also chooses nature over nurture, ignoring trauma and environmental factors that clearly influence mental health.
Individual differences get completely overlooked. Taylor's research showed men have 'fight or flight' responses whilst women show 'tend and befriend' - yet most biological studies generalise findings across genders without considering hormonal differences like oxytocin in women.
Exam Tip: Always discuss both strengths and weaknesses - the biological approach is scientifically solid but dangerously oversimplified.